Imho wrong. Ayn Rand would have 0 problems with someone giving money to someone voluntarily, out of their own volition, as an act of freedom. It is only at gun

Imho wrong. Ayn Rand would have 0 problems with someone giving money to someone voluntarily, out of their own volition, as an act of freedom. It is only at gun point that she had a problem with it (the method of the looters). The second handlers are the Peter Keatings, the people who only think of what other people think of them and act on that (so people who act without personality or integrity). I do agree that her "heroes" would not likely take money unless there was some value to be exchanged against it (ie like in an investment). At least, that is how I interpreted it.