> Bullshit. Your post starts with the assumptions that: 1) good patents exist, and 2) medical patents are good. You're so articulate. "Drug and medical patent

> Bullshit. Your post starts with the assumptions that: 1) good patents exist, and 2) medical patents are good. You're so articulate. "Drug and medical patents have at least some moral claim to virtue " is not an assumption that "medical patents are good." No it doesn't. Unless subtlety is lost on you.