no you are completely misreading it.. the average person is overwhelmed and distracted; uniformed service people and their close allies have no problem with thi

no you are completely misreading it.. the average person is overwhelmed and distracted; uniformed service people and their close allies have no problem with this technology, in fact it fits closely to their existing daily routine and worldview. Ordinary people are being required to use the same rigor and verification that uniform services use. What is the problem with that? similar fork in the analysis.. from the average person point of view it is invasive and "I didnt agree to this" but that is not what is important IMO; what happens is that the uniform services are prone to deep corruption because the rewards for that, and the ego of that, are just too great. IMO both "I can do this obviously illegal thing since no one can stop me" like some low-level thug mind, and "I make the rules and the rules say I get these privelages" much more common. This is a disaster for civil society unfolding now. A uniform services takeover of previously civilian and uniform mix. Who runs the ID system? updates the software ? checks for outstanding warrents? etc