3 ms·
Sorry, but unless you're a physicist, why would you expect to be able to know the significance of the paper? If you walked away misunderstanding the implication
by t8sr 3y ago
Sorry, but unless you're a physicist, why would you expect to be able to know the significance of the paper? If you walked away misunderstanding the implications, then I gotta ask - assuming you're in software - are you careful to proofread your papers to ensure a geologist doesn't misunderstand them?
- jerf 3y ago"Sorry, but unless you're a physicist, why would you expect to be able to know the significance of the paper?" Because I expect a news article on the topic to clearly contextualize that answer. That is a core component of their job. Quanta magazine is pretty good in most things I read, but I feel like they drop this particular ball pretty often. I suppose that concession to clickbaitery is the bare minimum anyone can survive with nowadays. But they are still several cuts above most things I read.