> There are so many edge-cases, free-speech and moral implications that shouldn't be left for the courts to decide and overturn and a whim. At least in the US

> There are so many edge-cases, free-speech and moral implications that shouldn't be left for the courts to decide and overturn and a whim. At least in the US this is kinda what the courts do, and some of these are even intended aims: Courts are basically the intended recourse for most edge cases because it’s unlikely legislation will cover all of them.