2 ms·
Because in the US a lack of explicit laws against something is typically interpreted as legal support. See pretty much any disruptive business mired in legal co
by danpalmer 3y ago
Because in the US a lack of explicit laws against something is typically interpreted as legal support. See pretty much any disruptive business mired in legal controversy. It's a cultural difference to many other countries where just because there isn't a law against something doesn't mean people will jump at the chance to exploit it at scale.