3 ms·
Nice article!! But this is not what you're testing. You're not determining the effect of imbalance alone, but imbalance + particular position of pieces. To det
by alexmolas 3y ago
Nice article!!
But this is not what you're testing. You're not determining the effect of imbalance alone, but imbalance + particular position of pieces. To determine the effect of imbalance you should study how does not having a certain piece since the beginning affect the result of the game.
Also, being a pawn up in the opening is much more different than being a pawn up in the end game. It would be interesting to redo this analysis but splitting by opening, middle game, and end game.
- jackmott42 3y agoI am amazed that you think the author doesn't already understand that.
- alexmolas 3y agoWell, I don't know if the author understands that or not, but I guess they do. I'm just pointing to the fact that the analysis can be misleading, and I just shared a proposal that I think it would make it more interesting :)
- moi2388 3y agoIf you take into account all variables aren’t you just writing a chess engine at that point?