4 ms·
There are separate terms for the API, which seem to indicate to me it's legal to use their API to download user content: https://www.reddit.com/wiki/api-terms h
by linuxftw 3y ago
There are separate terms for the API, which seem to indicate to me it's legal to use their API to download user content: https://www.reddit.com/wiki/api-terms https://www.reddit.com/wiki/api-terms
According to these terms, the content is owned by the users, and you're not to modify the content. However, if the content is owned by the users, then IMO Reddit cannot really say what you do or don't do with the content, as long as you're not building an application that acts as a proxy to Reddit.
The license is revocable to accessing their API, but they're not licensing you the user content, only the ability to download it. What you can do with that content is likely up to the laws in your jurisdiction. I'd say most content would qualify as public domain, though obviously some content will have copyright protection.
I would do the downloading now before they start charging for the API if you're serious about the project.
- dom96 3y ago> as long as you're not building an application that acts as a proxy to Reddit. Presumably you mean an app which displays Reddit.com as-is (i.e. with their logos/icons/UX). But what about a service which acts as a proxy to the Reddit API? If content is not owned by Reddit and API design cannot be copyrighted then this seems legal, right?
- linuxftw 3y agoIMO, the API terms look like they're written by a teenager, and you can do just about whatever you want. They admit the content is owned by the users, so not sure what they could actually enforce other than disallowing you to use their API. Once you have the content, it's none of their business at that point.