3 ms·
> What??? Read the post again: it was studiously neutral on the topic. Bullshit. Your post starts with the assumptions that: 1) good patents exist, and 2) medi
by Nullabillity 3y ago
> What??? Read the post again: it was studiously neutral on the topic.
Bullshit. Your post starts with the assumptions that: 1) good patents exist, and 2) medical patents are good.
Neither of those assumptions are "neutral".
- AlbertCory 3y ago> Bullshit. Your post starts with the assumptions that: 1) good patents exist, and 2) medical patents are good. You're so articulate. "Drug and medical patents have at least some moral claim to virtue " is not an assumption that "medical patents are good." No it doesn't. Unless subtlety is lost on you.