3 ms·
The head of the SEC was asked by congress if Eth was a security, and true to form he refused to answer. I don't understand how anyone can believe these people
by sebzim4500 3y ago
The head of the SEC was asked by congress if Eth was a security, and true to form he refused to answer.
I don't understand how anyone can believe these people act in good faith.
- scott_w 3y ago> 1. Firstly, if the law isn't settled, then no they wouldn't. > The head of the SEC was asked by congress if Eth was a security, and true to form he refused to answer. So what you're saying is that the Head of the SEC refused to answer a question they're not qualified to. Because it's an unsettled area of law that they're now challenging through enforcement action. > I don't understand how anyone can believe these people act in good faith. I could ask the same of you.
- amanaplanacanal 3y agoOne way to look at it: the SEC doesn’t decide what is legal. They have an opinion, but it is the courts that decide. This is the process working as designed.