3 ms·
Previous discussion from few days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36185055 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36185055
by js8 3y ago
Previous discussion from few days ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36185055 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36185055
- 2-718-281-828 3y agothis text certainly isn't relevant enough to warrant a second discussion within 8 days. it's a good example for imprecise reasoning where you chain arguments/claims/citations to reach a conclusion but with a little bit of ambiguity or vagueness sneaked in so you can lead it in any desired direction.