>Isn't this incredibly circular reasoning? You're critiquing someone for their action I think it's perfect, as arguably, you could say that about the initial p

>Isn't this incredibly circular reasoning? You're critiquing someone for their action I think it's perfect, as arguably, you could say that about the initial point as well (it's not altruistic because ego). When reduced this way, it doesn't really matter if ego is involved if the result actually makes an impact and betters someone else's life.