5 ms·
> It’s not ideal, and ideally people would have recognized talent at home and/or just included me because I was a living person, but they didn’t seem to have th
by ilyt 3y ago
> It’s not ideal, and ideally people would have recognized talent at home and/or just included me because I was a living person, but they didn’t seem to have this ethics.
What an egotistical thing to say. You're not entitled to have people waste time trying to "be friends with you" just because you're financially successful
> I’m workaholic because I don’t have enough friends.
You don't make friends and are workaholic because of it.
- eastbound 3y agoYou see, I’ve proven that I’m a good person in many occasions, despite naysayers. Now if we all must collude to make women in tech succeed, then surely we can include me at an improv group.
- ilyt 3y agoSorry I can't differentiate whether that was sarcasm or more self-ego stroking
- mtizim 3y agoWhat awful things to say.
- ilyt 3y agoWhat other response would you expect to someone complaining that people don't like him despise him having money ?
- hutzlibu 3y agoHe said people did not like him, because he was different. Did not recognized his talents. Considered him worthless. With him building up a succesful startup he clearly proofed he has talents. But it sounds like he would have traded some of that working time to get money, to spend time with friends instead. But he seems burned from his childhood experiences.
- jdsleppy 3y agoI think you misunderstand GP's post on a low level, words-and-their-definitions level. The story has a timeline to it, and during the hometown portion they were not wealthy and not discussing wealth yet. Read it more carefully.