3 ms·
If they are, a source with less antipathy to the practical nuclear alternative would be more compelling. Instead Greenpeace espouses a dogmatic position on both
by mhb 3y ago
If they are, a source with less antipathy to the practical nuclear alternative would be more compelling. Instead Greenpeace espouses a dogmatic position on both issues.
- yesbut 3y agoI don't make a blanket judgment on a claim based on some other claim. GP's stance on nuclear has nothing to do with the fact that carbon offsets are an accounting scam designed to virtue signal to the public and allow these mega corporations to continue with business as usual.