At least it doesn’t seem to be a net negative on the world. He could be using $100,000 to market crypto scams, or “prank” videos. Giving it to poor people, eve

At least it doesn’t seem to be a net negative on the world. He could be using $100,000 to market crypto scams, or “prank” videos. Giving it to poor people, even if not from pure generosity, is far from the worst thing he could be doing.