3 ms·

Would it better if he paid the people to make beads or dig holes instead of entertaining his viewers?

• namarie 3y ago
  I think so, yes. It'd be even better if he just gave the money, no strings attached.
  • junon 3y ago
    But then he'd have no money to give away. I don't see how it's this difficult to understand. Either you have Mr Beast as we do now - curing blindness and deafness, giving people houses and cars, raising millions for tangible, proven reforestation and sea cleanup efforts - or we don't have Mr Beast at all. I also find his videos uncomfortable to watch for many of the same reasons stated here, but I don't find them harmful, and I can appreciate how he's helped these people.
    • garte 3y ago
      But these videos only get watched exactly _because_ they are demeaning. So the problem is the nature of the videos itself and this alone disqualifies any good this guy supposedly does.
      • junon 3y ago
        I don't agree with that assertion at all.
  • blitzar 3y ago
    That would be like the pimp giving their stable of ho's money and not making them prostitute themselves. Who then would pay for their pimp-mobile and bling, and the upkeep of the ho's?