> Artists will continue to make art because it’s a compulsion. But I wish we had a world that was less oriented towards rewarding meaningless toil and would at

> Artists will continue to make art because it’s a compulsion. But I wish we had a world that was less oriented towards rewarding meaningless toil and would at least allow our born artists, writers, and creators the chance to do their obsessions to our benefit. Everybody is an artist, and everybody can create and share art for themselves and the people around them. That is art at is best, in my opinion. Commercialization and mass production and display and distribution of "art" is what degrades it for me. > Especially as we move post scarcity, I hope we can build a WPA like entity - perhaps, in a crazy twist, funded by AI? Post-scarcity will never happen because even the people with mansions in many countries, billion-dollar yachts, and fleets of private airplanes do not have enough. And 10 billion people can't even live like them. Why would the people who own most of the capital suddenly collectively decide they would like to share the production with the rest of the world? But if it did happen, we should not pay artists for art. We should give everybody enough so that if anybody wanted to paint a picture or hammer some metal into a horseshoe or knit a sweater or write some assembly code, they could do so.