2 ms·
Correct in a narrow range. Newton's elegance failed to accurately predict orbits of even our rather typical stellar system. Good for a start, but hardly somet
by willis936 3y ago
Correct in a narrow range. Newton's elegance failed to accurately predict orbits of even our rather typical stellar system. Good for a start, but hardly something to strive for once we know better. So where do we go next? There is a real chance of artificially keeping ourselves in a local minimum if we don't seriously consider inelegant theories. It'd be neat if someone came up with an elegant theory that accurately described nature from quantum fields to stars. It'd also be neat if someone did that with an inelegant theory.