Sure. It certainly seems that this is being proposed for reasons more aligned with the interests of patent holders than patent challengers. I’m just pointing o

Sure. It certainly seems that this is being proposed for reasons more aligned with the interests of patent holders than patent challengers. I’m just pointing out that without a discussion of the recent events which clearly motivate this rule change, the narrative is missing important context that makes the USPTO look like mustache-twirling villains for proposing this. They may in fact be villainous, but readers still deserve the full backstory to come to that conclusion themselves.