4 ms·
Recently, some university in the US came with yet another "inclusive language" update that was widely ridiculed for it tried to replace neutral and even positiv
by dahwolf 3y ago
Recently, some university in the US came with yet another "inclusive language" update that was widely ridiculed for it tried to replace neutral and even positive words and expressions. Language vandalism.
I've seen a theory as to where this is coming from. The particular university, as do many universities, have an inflated administration where some even have more staff than students. A significant part of that staff is DEI and pretty much everybody is to commit to this agenda.
So, you have a huge amount of people that continuously need to show evidence that they're committed to the cause. What would be the easiest thing to do?
You type in a bunch of bullshit in Word, because that's far easier than working in a soup kitchen. Actually improving the world is hard so instead you do this easy thing that provides the optics, and nothing more. You don't even need to believe it, it's largely driven by fear.
It's like an engine that can't be stopped.
- aintgonnatakeit 3y agoYou can say Stanford. It’s ok.
- richbell 3y agoHN discussion of that: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34039816 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34039816