4 ms·
J1772 should never have existed, IMO. It's pitiful 19.2 kW maximum charge rate hurt EV adoption by continuing the idea that it takes hours to charge your car.
by Sohcahtoa82 3y ago
J1772 should never have existed, IMO. It's pitiful 19.2 kW maximum charge rate hurt EV adoption by continuing the idea that it takes hours to charge your car.
In the conversation of NACS versus CSS, J1772 shouldn't even be part of the conversation. It's simply not relevant.
- saalweachter 3y agoYou frame the argument the way you want it to end. CSS is a fraction of the US fast chargers; NACS is a fraction of the total US EV chargers. NACS is used by 2/3rds of the existing BEV fleet; CSS/J1772 is used by 2/3rds of the existing plug-in EV fleet.