3 ms·
If we count that then we count an iPad remote-deskoping into a Mac, which severly limits the actual use.
by madeofpalk 3y ago
If we count that then we count an iPad remote-deskoping into a Mac, which severly limits the actual use.
- Asdrubalini 3y agoBut with the Vision Pro there is zero latency and the possibility of having many big screens, whilst when remote-desktoping into a Mac from an iPad you gain nothing and the high latency makes it worse.
- nomel 3y agoThis is how I work now, with my Quest Pro and my MacBook. It's using local Wifi (or USB), so the latency is very low.
- jayd16 3y agoWhy would the latency be lower on the AVP?
- Asdrubalini 3y agoBecause it's not remote, if you are streaming from your Mac, it's right there, at 2m at most. It's much different than remote connecting from an iPad 100 km away.
- jayd16 3y agoWhy would an iPad be forced to be 100km away?
- Asdrubalini 3y agoIt wouldn't, but why would you use an iPad as your main screen if you are near a Mac? It's just a screen, it doesn't bring anything special like the Vision Pro would.
- jayd16 3y agoThis isn't correct. The AVP can run apps side by side so you can have a window for xcode open along side your app. With the iPad you only get one app at a time, which is a bummer. (Even if you had multiple windows open only one app can have the full screen experience at once. Beyond that, even though an iPad can act as another monitor, it's not a big monitor. It doesn't really achieve the ideal of a workstation replacement.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- cassianoleal 3y agoCan it? The ad showed 1 single virtual window that acted as a mirror for the macbook's screen. It never showed 2 mac apps side-by-side, each in their own independent virtual window.
- senttoschool 3y agoThis is my question as well. Is this just showing just going to show one screen with the entire macOS in it? Or will we be able to individually project different macOS apps onto the canvas?