4 ms·
If he had refused to put pronouns entirely he probably would have been fired anyway. By doing it this way he at least has a shot of a religious discrimination s
by anonymouskimmer 3y ago
If he had refused to put pronouns entirely he probably would have been fired anyway. By doing it this way he at least has a shot of a religious discrimination suit.
- sterlind 3y agoI don't think he does, because his religious beliefs are accommodated: as a Catholic who believes God created him as male, he can select "he/him." The pronouns he uses were listed there for him to pick. The form didn't ask him to elaborate; he chose to. He was protesting the existence of the question because it gave other people an option he personally chose not to exercise - protesting that option is like protesting having pork as one of several options for team lunch, vs. just choosing not to have the pork.
- anonymouskimmer 3y agoThis comment says it more concisely than I did: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36301642 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36301642