4 ms·
My question would be why not hackintosh? easy to build these days, more customizable and able to get even better performance than Apple silicon...
by uniacid 3y ago
My question would be why not hackintosh? easy to build these days, more customizable and able to get even better performance than Apple silicon...
- op00to 3y agoDoes hackintosh still require custom kernel level drivers with no available source code?
- jamesy0ung 3y agoNope, OpenCore and most drivers are open source on GitHub
- least 3y agoYou get no support whatsoever with a hackintosh and generally the people that need these computers don’t also want to spend time doing their own IT support work as well.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- PartiallyTyped 3y agoTo be honest, my hackintosh from the Haswell era was the most stable machine I have had; certainly better than whatever the shitshow my current machine has been with OpenSuse or Manjaro on a 12th gen intel, and slightly ahead of my 5800x machine.
- Rebelgecko 3y agoAre there any good GPU options for Hackintosh? Seems like the top of the line is still based on what Nvidia and AMD were selling 5-10 years ago.
- pohuing 3y agoMy rx6900xt works fine through opencore and whatever red.
- Rebelgecko 3y agoOh cool, I didn't realize modern GPUs were usable
- justinclift 3y agoFor anyone curious, this seems to be one of the more popular easy Hackintosh-in-a-VM setup projects these days: * https://github.com/notAperson535/OneClick-macOS-Simple-KVM https://github.com/notAperson535/OneClick-macOS-Simple-KVM Works "out of the box" on Ubuntu, and apparently on Windows too thought I've not tried that. I've used it on Ubuntu occasionally when trying to diagnose intel specific macOS weirdness for a side project, when the weirdness doesn't show up on the M1 mac mini.
- EricE 3y agoIf you need your machine for $DayJob, you're not going to trust that to a hobbiest solution. And now that the transition to Apple Silicon is complete, don't expect future version of macOS to have an Intel version for much longer.