3 ms·
Just realized that obviously you don't need stability if you're using in-place quicksort, so the tiny-sort heapsort is a better recommendation. 304 bytes, altho
by mlochbaum 3y ago
Just realized that obviously you don't need stability if you're using in-place quicksort, so the tiny-sort heapsort is a better recommendation. 304 bytes, although the scaling to large arrays is much worse because of the awful access patterns.