3 ms·
Hyper-V is terrible in regards of video output performance and input responsiveness as its meant primarily for virtual machines running in the background.
by numlock86 3y ago
Hyper-V is terrible in regards of video output performance and input responsiveness as its meant primarily for virtual machines running in the background.
- lostmsu 3y agoNot related to the original topic, but now Hyper-V supports GPU virtualization. E.g. guest Windows 10 (starting from some build) can see and use host GPU.
- realitythreek 3y agoI’ve looked into this recently. Microsoft has ended support for RemoteFx [1] and Discrete Device Assignments requires a supported gpu dedicated to that VM. From my perspective, Hyper-V lacks a good vGPU story but would love to hear otherwise. 1. https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/kb4570006-update-to-disable-and-remove-the-remotefx-vgpu-component-in-windows-bbdf1531-7188-2bf4-0de6-641de79f09d2 https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/kb4570006-update-t...
- lostmsu 3y agoNo, it is way better than RemoteFx or DDA. Your VM gets a virtualized GPU. So with 1 NVidia card you can use 3D acceleration and CUDA on both host and guest at the same time. See https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/jym8xz/gpu_partitioning_is_finally_possible_in_hyperv/ https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/jym8xz/gpu_partit...
- numlock86 3y ago> but now Hyper-V supports GPU virtualization Yes, but getting that to display still is bound to low performance and delay. It's meant for GPU related tasks to utilize resources solely for computing.