4 ms·
> Zelda clones so I don’t don’t need to pay games that are graded on the Nintendo Curve. Huh?
by highwaylights 3y ago
> Zelda clones so I don’t don’t need to pay games that are graded on the Nintendo Curve.
Huh?
- fragmede 3y agoCorrected: > Zelda clones so I don’t need to play games that are graded on the Nintendo Curve. hospitalJail is saying there are similar games out there, and that they don't need to play games from Nintendo that are unfairly rated well just because they're from Nintendo, despite a former obsession with Nintendo.
- highwaylights 3y agoAh, understand now. If we’re querying review bias it becomes inherently subjective so probably not much point in discussing it beyond that even if I disagree. I’m unsure of anyone producing games of a quality and polish level that rivals Nintendo, but that’s subjective too.
- hospitalJail 3y ago>I’m unsure of anyone producing games of a quality and polish level that rivals Nintendo, but that’s subjective too. like sub 20 FPS, empty worlds, 5 enemies with different skins(okay, factually there were 11 enemies, meanwhile MM had over 70 enemies), same story as the last 30 years, annoying combat mechanics, grindy crafting(food) mechanics. But IGN said it was the greatest game of all time 10/10 and never mentioned a single issue. That is what happens when we grade on the Nintendo curve.