3 ms·
I fully understand that Reddit needs money to keep the site running and the way to do that is via premium or showing ads. The 3rd party apps should never have p
by jms703 3y ago
I fully understand that Reddit needs money to keep the site running and the way to do that is via premium or showing ads. The 3rd party apps should never have promised a "no ads" experience IMO.
I'm ok if using a 3rd party app means paying a modest fee to use Reddit and not see ads. I have no idea what a reasonable rate is, but Reddit Premium is not it. I don't get that kind of value out of it.
- aaomidi 3y agothird party devs have asked Reddit multiple times for an ad endpoint in the API. The really good move here would’ve been profit sharing on ads between Reddit and third party apps. But heck these devs were fine displaying ads for Reddit for nothing in return. Reddit didn’t care.
- poyu 3y agoWhile I do agree that Reddit probably doesn't care, the ad endpoint approach is harder to implement than one would imagine. Normally ads have strict requirements for the placement (show one ad every x amount of posts), which would be hard to enforce across all 3rd party clients. Not to mention that they might be targeted towards the user, measure exposure time, and record interactions. I think the only way to do this is having some sort of SDK, but they probably determined that the cost would be too high.
- aaomidi 3y agoI honestly believe that Reddit has ad targeting figured out in the form of subreddits. Second, Reddit had/has an opportunity to hear to actually dictate the ad placement rules themselves. They don’t need to promise a certain number of placement, but rather a certain number of clicks. Finally, they could have made the ad API something that’s locked behind a human review until the app got popular enough. I agree that it’s simply not worth it to fully automate this. Realistically there’s less than 15 clients that would need to implement this.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]