3 ms·
Skeptics will stay skeptics whatever we say. Last time the timeframe was too long, this time the timeframe is too short. "we had ice age in the past", "we had
by lm28469 3y ago
Skeptics will stay skeptics whatever we say. Last time the timeframe was too long, this time the timeframe is too short.
"we had ice age in the past", "we had warming in the past", 1990 is too close, -2m years is too far, the sun is closer (it's not), "numbers can say anything", "oooooh spooky graphs ;)" &c.
- klyrs 3y agoIf we move the goalpost to before we started collecting data, then all studies are invalid and the problem goes away!