3 ms·
If you read the guideline[0] it is way more circumspect. There are a lot of "probably" all over it. There is a need for way more research for a definitive guide
by zouhair 3y ago
If you read the guideline[0] it is way more circumspect. There are a lot of "probably" all over it. There is a need for way more research for a definitive guideline as it is stated in this guideline.
[0]: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240073616 https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240073616
- user_7832 3y agoThanks for your comment. Having read the conclusion, it is more of the authors saying "NSS could be responsible for hypertension/T2 Diabetes etc but it's not really conclusive". I'll likely still consume some NSS'es though that is more due to my preexisting condition.
- zouhair 3y agoThey are following the science where it's going. The guideline will change when new science arise. But still we have ways to go in popularization of science.