> 1. Wearable everywhere all the time Seems clear to me that's not a minimum requirement for viability. The ease of integrating the device into the situations

> 1. Wearable everywhere all the time Seems clear to me that's not a minimum requirement for viability. The ease of integrating the device into the situations where is might be useful is certainly important, but there's a sliding scale. I'm not sure where it becomes viable, but I don't think it's all the way at the end of the scale. Actually, I think this entire analysis is backwards. The question isn't how far from perfect the Vision Pro, or any other VR/AR/MR device is, but whether it does enough things well enough to be worth the trouble. (For me, it looks like the VP does not, mainly due to the price tag. That's even assuming some new major drawbacks that become apparent once it's released.)