> I don't think that just using a distinct brand is enough - it's all about probable customer confusion The entire point of this ruling was to say that using a

> I don't think that just using a distinct brand is enough - it's all about probable customer confusion The entire point of this ruling was to say that using a distinct brand can be enough. Customers were not confused between a dog toy and a bottle of Jack Daniels. The issue Jack Daniels had was its distinct brand being used to sell something else.