So the SCOTUS didn't rule that it did or did not violate the trademark. They ruled that there wasn't a direct first amendment protection for it and that it nee

So the SCOTUS didn't rule that it did or did not violate the trademark. They ruled that there wasn't a direct first amendment protection for it and that it needs to go back to the lower courts to be adjudicated. Basically the case can't be dismissed outright based on first amendment precedent/law.