Given the topic of conversation, it is a necessary bit of pedantry. If we are going to abandon "climate change" because it does not fully convey the issue, repl

Given the topic of conversation, it is a necessary bit of pedantry. If we are going to abandon "climate change" because it does not fully convey the issue, replacing it with "oil catastrophe", which also does not fully convey the issue, is not particularly useful. The latter is going to leave people thinking that all we need to do is stop using oil, which may be a good start, but not a complete solution.