3 ms·
I'm not sure that's a better comparison, because the subject of the JD lawsuit, the toy had the exact imagery of the JD brand - not an alteration of it.
by q1w2 3y ago
I'm not sure that's a better comparison, because the subject of the JD lawsuit, the toy had the exact imagery of the JD brand - not an alteration of it.
- kemayo 3y agoIt's subjective, but to me the picture of the dog toy in the article looks about as distinct from a real bottle of Jack Daniels as that Google logo example.
- q1w2 3y agoThere is legal importance in the brand symbol specifically - moreso than the product shape. The correct comparison is brand symbol/mark to brand symbol/mark.