3 ms·
Jack Daniels invented their distinctive design, and this was specifically imitating that. There is no owner of the concept of what an apple looks like, with or
by jkaplowitz 3y ago
Jack Daniels invented their distinctive design, and this was specifically imitating that. There is no owner of the concept of what an apple looks like, with or with a bite taken out of it, except for the specific logo images copyrighted by someone like a Apple Inc.
What’s relevant here is that the chance is illegally high that someone who looks at the general appearance of the dog toy but doesn’t take the time to read the actual words might think, “oh cool, Jack Daniels is releasing a dog toy!” rather than that another company is parodying Jack Daniels.
It’s exactly this kind of confusion which trademark law is meant to prevent. Even someone who reads the words on the toy might think, “oh cool, Jack Daniels has enough of a sense of humor to make fun of themselves on a dog toy.” It’s legitimately not obvious that the toy isn’t from them.
- P_I_Staker 3y ago[flagged]
- phpisthebest 3y ago[flagged]
- snapplebobapple 3y agoIt's the George Carlin defense of trademark. "Looks how dumb the average person is, then realize half of them are dumber than that your honor! Ergo, ceteris paribus, E pluribus unum, everyone is violating our copyright/patent/trademark and all should pay us royalties."
- djbusby 3y agoNah. Cause well known brands can and do put/share-out their identity on all kinds of stupid shit. Therefore the Whiskey to DogToy boundary is very thin.