"People coming here to work is seen as a problem" is precisely what the debate's about. It's not a conclusion. And how can this be a broad generalization if it

"People coming here to work is seen as a problem" is precisely what the debate's about. It's not a conclusion. And how can this be a broad generalization if it's already about immigrants? "Immigrants are not one kind of people with one kind of mentality." Hmm ok... But what if your data is not partitioned the way you like? Should they still draw conclusions from dta that does not exist? If you see the actual source PDF document, the sources cited are much more than just Hispanic immigrants. Oh and Hispanic means a bunch of different countries, not just Mexico. So please don't equate "Spanish speaking" with "must be only from Mexico." Only about half of Hispanic immigrants to the USA come from Mexico. It's not a personal attack. I have a problem with how you wrote what you wrote, I've written lots of dumb things myself, including my first reply to you.