So is this correct: an entire trademark called bad spaniels was designed off an existing trademark, Jack Daniel's? SCOTUS thought even though the trademark'd c

So is this correct: an entire trademark called bad spaniels was designed off an existing trademark, Jack Daniel's? SCOTUS thought even though the trademark'd company is a different industry, trademark must be dissimilar to another trademark. If so, parody of trademarks is still ok as long as business identity is not being built on those parodies. The article headline would be incorrect in this case.