3 ms·
Oh man I'm split on this one. Thank god I don't need to make such hard decisions. That is clearly not Jack Daniels. That clearly looks like Jack Daniels. I pe
by hospitalJail 3y ago
Oh man I'm split on this one. Thank god I don't need to make such hard decisions.
That is clearly not Jack Daniels. That clearly looks like Jack Daniels.
I personally would let this product slide, however, if this wasnt a dog toy, but rather liquor... yeah imagine seeing an entire isle of this stuff, it would make it hard to find the Jack Daniels.
- michaelt 3y ago> if this wasnt a dog toy, but rather liquor [...] it would make it hard to find the Jack Daniels. Sure, but that wouldn't be a parody - it would be a completely different area of trademark law. 99% of trademark disputes are bourbon makers squabbling over who gets to put an eagle on their bottles, and oat milk makers squabbling over whether it's confusing that both products say 'oat' on them. Questions of parody are a different area of law - no reasonable consumer could possibly confuse a dog toy with a bottle of whiskey.