4 ms·
This isn't twitter, and even on twitter these threads are frowned upon. Low effort SEO content is not welcome on hackernews.
by anonylizard 3y ago
This isn't twitter, and even on twitter these threads are frowned upon.
Low effort SEO content is not welcome on hackernews.
- FrustratedMonky 3y agoThat is bit harsh. Twitter allows posts to promote Nazis. I don't think they are going to quibble over a list of open source AI frameworks.
- cslowik 3y agoI understand the content did not meet your needs and you have all rights to verbalize your disappointment but I don't agree to calling it "low effort SEO". I have no personal interest in promoting any of these models. I shared the article with a belief that it may be helpful for people who are exploring the alternatives to GPT (like I was a week ago).
- commoner 3y ago> I have no personal interest in promoting any of these models. Could you please add direct links to the home page or repo of each of the projects in the article? Readers expect to be able to click on the name of a project to see the project first-hand. The lack of these links combined with the "contact us" sales pitch at the bottom is part of what makes this article look spammy and seems to contradict your claim of "no personal interest".