3 ms·
It's marketing in action, though Chris Lattner's reputation from LLVM and Swift has a lot to do with why it quickly gained a high profile in these circles. May
by jlokier 3y ago
It's marketing in action, though Chris Lattner's reputation from LLVM and Swift has a lot to do with why it quickly gained a high profile in these circles.
Maybe it's true, maybe it isn't. But who do you think has a vested interest in that meme being repeated? Mojo is a commercial, closed source language implementation backed by $30M of investor cash looking to turn a profit.
I wish them luck and watch with interest. Like a lot of people I've had "write a very fast Python and ??? and profit" on my todo list for a while (it remains below "job to pay the bills" though) because there's been obvious user interest for some years, although it's not clear if that translates to much commercial demand. I think if they are successful and if they remain closed source, an open source clone will appear soon after, and within a year or two will match or outperform them on reported performance, but they will still have a business for the same sorts of reasons Red Hat remains profitable.
- osigurdson 3y agoIt is interesting, I don't think a company based on a language can work. They need to open source the language and make money on something else. The best "something else" would be cloud services that find optimal ways to run the Mojo code (finding the right combinations of C/G/TPUs in some way). A closed source language with a licensing fee is never going to work.
- minetest2048 3y agoMathworks does it with Matlab. With that said Matlab does got annihilated by python in ML because its a closed sourced lang
- osigurdson 3y agoGood point. To clarify: a closed source general purpose language with a licensing fee is never going to work.