2 ms·
> (removing extreme TOS stuff - racism, hate speech etc) Why would you edit these? Deletion seems far superior, do you want people to go around editing out the
by constantcrying 3y ago
> (removing extreme TOS stuff - racism, hate speech etc)
Why would you edit these? Deletion seems far superior, do you want people to go around editing out the racism of peoples posts? Seems absurd.
- smcl 3y agoI'd personally hide or delete them. But I can see why someone might argue for this functionality, it's not totally absurd. What's absurd is a CEO editing posts to troll people
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> Deletion seems far superior, do you want people to go around editing out the racism of peoples posts? The generous argument for would be it preserves any redeeming value in the offending comment. The practical answer is he (EDIT: spez) wanted something to rail against.
- smcl 3y agoCan't really see how my comments suggest I'm "rail[ing] against" something
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> how my comments suggest I'm "rail[ing] against" something Sorry, clarified. Spez wanted something to attack.
- smcl 3y agoAhhhh sure, no worries!