3 ms·
"Now, people much more junior expect all of that, plus crazy workplaces, free meals, free babysitting, free carwash, free haircuts, etc." Junior or not, only a
by nadam 15y ago
"Now, people much more junior expect all of that, plus crazy workplaces, free meals, free babysitting, free carwash, free haircuts, etc."
Junior or not, only a tiny percentage of people can get these perks. For example google recieves 1 million CVs a year approximately 5000 of which get a job offer (0.5%). (approximately 35% of those who are allowed to have a phone interview are allowed to the onsite interviews and approximately 25% of the 'onsite-interviewed' people get a job offer.)
- alexis-d 15y agoDo you have any sources for those numbers? Thanks!
- nadam 15y agoSure. This is the most informative public document I've found on the Google hiring process, it contains the 35% and 25% estimation: http://www.qqtm.info/Interview/Google_Guide.pdf http://www.qqtm.info/Interview/Google_Guide.pdf The 0.5% (in fact less than 0.5%) comes from Google itself, from Don Dodge's blog: http://dondodge.typepad.com/the_next_big_thing/2010/09/how-to-get-a-job-at-google-interview-questions-hiring-process.html http://dondodge.typepad.com/the_next_big_thing/2010/09/how-t... I've researched this because I was on an onsite interview at Google on Tuesday and I am waiting for their answer right now...
- alexis-d 15y agoThanks, good luck!
- alapshah 15y agoThat is totally true, but a very large percentage of those 1 million are people who simply have no chance of getting the job. Google is seen as a hot company and place to work for so it attracts a lot of resumes, much more than microsoft ever was... And they make it pretty darned easy to apply. There are some other interesting numbers in this infographic - salaries and such: http://img.gtricks.com/2011/10/job-in-google.png http://img.gtricks.com/2011/10/job-in-google.png
- Drbble 15y agoI realize my comment is redundant because you already said "infographic", but that image is garbage. The salary numbers are incredibly misleading, since they ignore stock or are an arbitrary sample.