The main challenge seems that leadership is so poor at making the case for what they believe will be gained. It's always vague things like networking, training

The main challenge seems that leadership is so poor at making the case for what they believe will be gained. It's always vague things like networking, training or energy. Add to that the point that the few stated examples are usually available if staff come in even a modest amount of the time, ie they are an argument against full remote rather than an argument against majority remote.