3 ms·
I agree with your first part. Your proposed solution, I disagree with. >I don't think a blanket return to work is what's needed, a more targeted appropriate on
by senttoschool 3y ago
I agree with your first part. Your proposed solution, I disagree with.
>I don't think a blanket return to work is what's needed, a more targeted appropriate one might be though, identify who's presence is required and pay them commensurately to be in the office. Working from home gets you less but you get the flexibility.
And how exactly do you do this? What if the person who's presence is required in the office depends on people who don't need to be in the office? What now? And how is it fair to everyone that some people can WFH but others can't?
- drumhead 3y agoIt comes with the job description. People will be intelligent enough to recognise that they need to be in the office, and they'll be rewarded more for it. I think it was the boss of Goldman that told remote workers don't expect a New York salary if your not working in New York.