3 ms·
Internet privacy is one perfectly valid area for government to get involved. The average person has no idea about cookies, Facebook or Google tracking or how on
by casca 15y ago
Internet privacy is one perfectly valid area for government to get involved. The average person has no idea about cookies, Facebook or Google tracking or how online ads are profiling them. The sop offered from the supply side has been to offer "opt-outs" which still track you. The more technical might use adblock, noscript or requestpolicy, but by doing this, we're just shifting the cost on our fellow internet users. This is not fair.
When the people's ignorance or reasonable lack of ability is being abused by corporations, that's exactly the time for the government to step in. Not the misguided EU cookie directive that just gives more power to the incumbents, but a genuine ability to protect their privacy by default.
Opt out you say? Such arrogance. Your responsibility as the priests of the electronic age* is to help your flock, not take advantage of them.
* as in you're holding exotic knowledge and power that is beyond the understanding of the average mortal
- newman314 15y agoThe problem is one arm appears to offer the branch of privacy whilst another chips away at it using clauses in bills under the guise of protection for copyright etc. Unfortunately, it appears that continued vigilance is needed to defend against bad laws.
- HistoryInAction 15y agoYep, that's the exact position the gov't is taking, with the added position of, "hey, tech companies, we're gonna sit you down with privacy advocates and anti-regulation people to hash this out." Also nice: the gov't is applying this to information sharing internally first, so we have a chance to sandbox for the while it'll take for Congress to take any action.