4 ms·

I’m using sarcasm, sure. But do you think it’s unwarranted when I’m against arguments how only person driving the car could be affected by FSD or that self driv

I’m using sarcasm, sure. But do you think it’s unwarranted when I’m against arguments how only person driving the car could be affected by FSD or that self driving is an AI problem? I assume you either don’t argue in good faith, or have understanding of the problem area from following Musk’s and his influencer’s tweets. But I agree with you, it’s not productive. I’ll take my “small set of points” about such an irrelevant things like safety engineering (and no, it’s not a just noun, it’s an engineering discipline) and disengage here. Just to address one thing tho - YouTubers making videos is and Tesla releasing it to more people to recognize deferred revenue is not testing. And you can see from constant regressions that it doesn’t work as testing. And before you throw “well, that’s just how AI works”, maybe you’ll make a connection on how self driving isn’t an AI problem. It’s just one of the many many tools used to solve it.

onethought 3y ago
Note you still didn't answer or provide any evidence of "Safety Engineering" from Mercedes. Just the usual Tesla trolling. AI is the approach that Tesla, Waymo, Nvidia, Cruise, Comma, and even Mercedes are taking. So to ask the question one last time (third time lucky) - How is Mercedes validating the data they use for training without "Testing in Prod" as you criticise Tesla for. Either: They aren't, in which case your whole rant on the lack of "Safety Engineering" at Tesla is moot, because Mercedes is rolling out essentially untested AI systems. OR They are validating their data in real life just like Tesla do, in which case your whole rant on the lack of "Safety Engineering" at Tesla is moot, because Mercedes is just as bad and supposedly have "Safety Engineering" in your opinion. This is why I keep asking, and this is why you keep not answering.

onethought 3y ago

Note you still didn't answer or provide any evidence of "Safety Engineering" from Mercedes. Just the usual Tesla trolling. AI is the approach that Tesla, Waymo, Nvidia, Cruise, Comma, and even Mercedes are taking. So to ask the question one last time (third time lucky) - How is Mercedes validating the data they use for training without "Testing in Prod" as you criticise Tesla for. Either: They aren't, in which case your whole rant on the lack of "Safety Engineering" at Tesla is moot, because Mercedes is rolling out essentially untested AI systems. OR They are validating their data in real life just like Tesla do, in which case your whole rant on the lack of "Safety Engineering" at Tesla is moot, because Mercedes is just as bad and supposedly have "Safety Engineering" in your opinion. This is why I keep asking, and this is why you keep not answering.