3 ms·
I am sure there are examples where JPEG XL outperforms AVIF. But looking through all those images in the test sample I get the impression that AVIF on average i
by eis 3y ago
I am sure there are examples where JPEG XL outperforms AVIF. But looking through all those images in the test sample I get the impression that AVIF on average in the lowest quality setting is significantly better than JPEG XL.
I agree that the example you presented indeed has the mentioned shadow issue in AVIF.
- JyrkiAlakuijala 3y agoIf tiny quality was 1.0 bpp, low quality 1.5 bpp, and medium quality 2.5 bpp and high quality 4.0 bpp, JPEG XL would win in all categories. In reality cameras produce about 3.5-4.5 bpp, and the internet uses an average of 2 bpp for photographs.
- cubefox 3y agoRealistically AVIF would mostly be used to reduce file size relative to JPEG, not increase quality.