6 ms·
WebP lossy has abysmal quality compared to JPEG, and MozJPEG closed the file size gap quite a lot to make old JPEG a clear winner over WebP. JPEG XL doesn't fa
by chungy 3y ago
WebP lossy has abysmal quality compared to JPEG, and MozJPEG closed the file size gap quite a lot to make old JPEG a clear winner over WebP.
JPEG XL doesn't fall into the same trappings of basing on a video intraframe and limited chroma support.
- mikae1 3y agoYes, this. ^ > WebP seems to have about 10% better compression compared to libjpeg in most cases, except with 1500px images where the compression is about equal.[1] [1] https://siipo.la/blog/is-webp-really-better-than-jpeg https://siipo.la/blog/is-webp-really-better-than-jpeg
- JyrkiAlakuijala 3y agoJpegli was introduced after this comparison and makes the old jpeg standard perform quite a bit better and to have HDR support (10+ bits), too.