> What I don’t understand is how they used an unencrypted form of communication for such important topics. How do you know they did? For all we know, this was

> What I don’t understand is how they used an unencrypted form of communication for such important topics. How do you know they did? For all we know, this was on an internal mail system that encrypted messages everywhere, except when showing their content to humans (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analog_hole https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analog_hole) Also, FTA: “[This document is from Epic v. Apple (2021).]” I think that means they would have been forced to disclose this, even if it were encrypted (“we lost the keys” would be a viable defense to that, but would require a really, really good set of arguments supporting the claim that happened before a court order arrived)